www.varorud.org
ÈÀÀ ÂÀÐÎÐÓÄ
Russian Version
Ïîãîäà
  Sogd +7 +9°C
  Khatlon +10 +13°C
  GBAO +3 +4°C
  RRP +4 +6°C
  Dushanbe +8 +10°C
 USD 3.1954
 EURO 3.7530
 RUS 1.1032

ANALITICS - GLANCE

WHAT’S THE JOINT PURPOSE OF BUSH AND BLAIR?

In spite of the near time of Baghdad downfall it is early yet to tell that on capturing the capital of Iraq by coalition the war will have been terminated. Nobody can guarantee that a partisan was wouldn’t burst out on the occupied territory. However, the USA and Great Britain being sure of becoming winners already think about the future structural system of Iraq. The United Nations seeming to have reinstated the image of the most authoritative organization of world scale of later tries to be admitted to the participation in the post-war restoration of peaceful life in Iraq after the resolution of its Security Council was openly ignored; however, if to judge by the tough stance pursued by Washington UNO is hardly imagined to gain more that a right for humanitarian operations. Though in the course of the meeting in Northern Ireland Bush and Blair spoke on its “key” role in this process. This declaration seems to be more like a concession to Great Britain on the part of the USA as an ally that to UNO itself. American provisional governance the USA laid accounts with seems not to have been liked by the British prime-minister. In such a crucial moment when the resistance of the Iraqi army has not been conquered yet Bush gave in in the argument with Blair though the latter understands perfectly well that it would be unclever to claim for equal participation in post-war arrangement of Iraq on a par with the USA. Hence follows that Great Britain is disturbed with the intensified American military presence in the Middle East. Civil governance which in due time can easily ceded to local puppet regime is much better than military ruling when the USA would be enjoying patent advantage. Tony Blair’s position is accounted for just by this consideration as he looks upon the United Nations Organization as being bound to play the primary role in the future arrangement in Iraq. As for Bush’s consent with UNO “key” role, it may be a temporal compromise with his ally or only a dictum to compose all the rest until the war is finished. However the events in the Middle East may be developing further, the USA and Great Britain are eager to reimburse as sooner as possible those financial expenses they put into the organization f the military campaign. It is Iraqi oil that is schemed to serve as a source of this reimbursement. To their luck they will have enough time until a democratic government is established. But even at this stage American and British companies are hardly imagined to miss their chances having once engrafted themselves into the economy of Iraq.

Whose war may be called just? 02.04.2003
Do live and work according to law - you will see that life is much easier... 19.03.2003
What is to be done if money is torn? 12.03.2003
War in the Middle East: Pro and Cons... 05.03.2003
Where is friendship thre is good service... 19.02.2003
What should militia posts look like?
30.01.2003

Write us: webmaster@varorud.org